Skip to content

Resources

Our quality standard

How a resource earns its place here.

Every resource sold or shared on this site is read by a TMP reviewer before it goes live. We hold teachers and publishers to the same bar we hold our own work to. The criteria below are exactly what reviewers score, so you can check your work against them before you submit.

1. Requirements checked before a reviewer reads it

A resource cannot be submitted until all of these are true. The creator’s page lists what is still missing.

2. What the reviewer scores

Every criterion is scored from 0 to 4 (0 Unacceptable, 1 Weak, 2 Adequate, 3 Good, 4 Excellent). The first three are gates: a failure on any of them can never be made up for by strengths elsewhere.

  1. 1. Accuracy and curriculum fitGate

    Are the facts, worked solutions and answers correct, and does the content match the stated level and curriculum?

    4, Excellent: Checked line by line: no errors found; maps clearly to the curriculum's objectives.

    0, Unacceptable: Factual or mathematical errors, or content from the wrong level.

  2. 2. Originality and rightsGate

    Is it the creator's own work, or properly licensed? No copied textbooks, pirated past papers, or uncredited images?

    4, Excellent: Clearly original, with any third-party material credited and licensed.

    0, Unacceptable: Copied or unlicensed material.

  3. 3. Safety and privacyGate

    Is it free of personal data about children, harmful or inappropriate content, advertising, and links that take buyers away from TMP?

    4, Excellent: Nothing of concern; links (if any) go only to reputable educational sources.

    0, Unacceptable: Personal data, harmful content, or unsafe links.

  4. 4. Learning outcomes and structure

    Are there clear learning outcomes, a sensible order, and a progression from simple to demanding?

    4, Excellent: Outcomes are specific and each section demonstrably builds toward them.

    0, Unacceptable: No discernible purpose or order.

  5. 5. Teaching quality

    Does it explain, not just state: worked examples, practice questions, answers or marking guidance, and ways to check understanding?

    4, Excellent: Clear explanations, varied worked examples, graded practice and full answers.

    0, Unacceptable: Bare facts or questions with no help to learn.

  6. 6. Language and presentation

    Is the writing clear and correct for the age group, and is the layout readable (type size, spacing, consistent headings, legible diagrams)?

    4, Excellent: Polished, professional, and a pleasure to read.

    0, Unacceptable: Hard to read or riddled with mistakes.

  7. 7. Age-appropriateness and inclusion

    Is the tone, difficulty and context right for the learners, and respectful of all backgrounds, including Ghanaian examples where relevant?

    4, Excellent: Well pitched, relevant to Ghanaian learners, inclusive.

    0, Unacceptable: Inappropriate for the age group or stereotyping.

  8. 8. Value for the pricePaid resources only

    Given the price, is there enough depth, originality and polish that a parent would feel the money was well spent?

    4, Excellent: Clearly worth more than it costs.

    0, Unacceptable: Thin for the price asked.

3. How the decision is made

4. After approval

Become a creator Browse resources